3.0-T MR-guided transgluteal in-bore-targeted prostate biopsy under local anesthesia in patients without rectal access: a single-institute experience and review of literature.

PURPOSE: To describe the technique and evaluate the performance of MRI-guided transgluteal in-bore-targeted biopsy of the prostate gland under local anesthesia in patients without rectal access. METHODS: Ten men (mean age, 69 (range 57-86) years) without rectal access underwent 13 MRI-guided transgluteal in-bore-targeted biopsy of the prostate gland under local anesthesia. All patients underwent mp-MRI at our institute prior to biopsy. Three patients had prior US-guided transperineal biopsy which was unsuccessful in one, negative in one, and yielded GG1 (GS6) PCa in one. Procedure time, complications, histopathology result, and subsequent management were recorded. RESULTS: Median interval between rectal surgery and presentation with elevated PSA was 12.5 years (interquartile range (IQR) 25-75, 8-36.5 years). Mean PSA was 11.9 (range, 4.8 -59.0) ng/ml and PSA density was 0.49 (0.05 -3.2) ng/ml/ml. Distribution of PI-RADS v2.0/2.1 scores of the targeted lesions were PI-RADS 5-3; PI-RADS 4-6; and PI-RADS 3-1. Mean lesion size was 1.5 cm (range, 1.0-3.6 cm). Median interval between MRI and biopsy was 5.5 months (IQR 25-75, 1.5-9 months). Mean procedure time was 47.4 min (range, 29-80 min) and the number of cores varied between 3 and 5. Of the 13 biopsies, 4 yielded clinically significant prostate cancer (csPca), with a Gleason score ≥ 7, 1 yielded insignificant prostate cancer (Gleason score = 6), 7 yielded benign prostatic tissue, and one was technically unsuccessful. 3/13 biopsies were repeat biopsies which detected csPCa in 2 out of the 3 patients. None of the patients had biopsy-related complication. Biopsy result changed management to radiation therapy with ADT in 2 patients with the rest on active surveillance. CONCLUSION: MRI-guided transgluteal in-bore-targeted biopsy of the prostate gland under local anesthesia is feasible in patients without rectal access.

Effect of a physiotherapy-directed rehabilitation programme on patients with multidirectional instability of the glenohumeral joint: a multimodal interventional MRI study protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Altered neuromuscular control of the scapula and humeral head is a typical feature of multidirectional instability (MDI) of the glenohumeral joint, suggesting a central component to this condition. A previous randomised controlled trial showed MDI patients participating in the Watson Instability Program 1 (WIP1) had significantly improved clinical outcomes compared with a general shoulder strength programme. The aim of this paper is to outline a multimodal MRI protocol to identify potential ameliorative effects of the WIP1 on the brain. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Thirty female participants aged 18-35 years with right-sided atraumatic MDI and 30 matched controls will be recruited. MDI patients will participate in 24 weeks of the WIP1, involving prescription and progression of a home exercise programme. Multimodal MRI scans will be collected from both groups at baseline and in MDI patients at follow-up. Potential brain changes (primary outcome 1) in MDI patients will be probed using region-of-interest (ROI) and whole-brain approaches. ROIs will depict areas of functional alteration in MDI patients during executed and imagined shoulder movements (MDI vs controls at baseline), then examining the effects of the 24-week WIP1 intervention (baseline vs follow-up in MDI patients only). Whole-brain analyses will examine baseline versus follow-up voxel-wise measures in MDI patients only. Outcome measures used to assess WIP1 efficacy will include the Western Ontario Shoulder Index and the Melbourne Instability Shoulder Score (primary outcomes 2 and 3). Secondary outcomes will include the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, Short Form Orebro, Global Rating of Change Score, muscle strength, scapular upward rotation, programme compliance and adverse events. DISCUSSION: This trial will establish if the WIP1 is associated with brain changes in MDI. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Participant confidentiality will be maintained with publication of results. Swinburne Human Research Ethics Committee (Ref: 20202806-5692). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ACTRN12621001207808).

Significant prostate cancer risk after MRI-guided biopsy showing benign findings: Results from a cohort of 381 men.

BACKGROUND: MRI-guided biopsy (MGB) contributes to the diagnosis of clinically significant Prostate Cancer (csPCa). However, there are no clear recommendations for the management of men after a negative MGB. The aim of this study was to assess the risk of csPCa after a first negative MGB. METHODS: Between 2014 and 2020, we selected men with a PI-RADS score ≥ 3 on MRI and a negative MGB (showing benign findings) performed for suspected prostate cancer. MGB (targeted and systematic biopsies) was performed using fully integrated mobile fusion imaging (KOELIS). The primary endpoint was the rate of csPCa (defined as an ISUP grade ≥ 2) diagnosed after a first negative MGB. RESULTS: A total of 381 men with a negative MGB and a median age of 65 (IQR: 59-69, range: 46-85) years were included. During the median follow-up of 31 months, 124 men (32.5%) had a new MRI, and 76 (19.9%) were referred for a new MGB, which revealed csPCa in 16 (4.2%) of them. We found no statistical difference in the characteristics of men diagnosed with csPCa compared with men with no csPCa after the second MGB. CONCLUSION: We observed a risk of significant prostate cancer in 4% of men two years after a negative MRI-guided biopsy. Performing a repeat MRI could improve the selection of men who will benefit from a repeat MRI-guided biopsy, but a clear protocol is needed to follow these patients.

Magnetic Resonance-guided Procedures: Consensus on Rationale, Techniques, and Outcomes.

Magnetic resonance (MR) image guidance has demonstrated significant potential in the field of interventional radiology in several applications. This article covers the main points of MR-guided hepatic tumor ablation as a representative of MR-guided procedures. Patient selection and appropriate equipment utilization are essential for successful MR-guided tumor ablation. Intra-procedural planning imaging enables the visualization of the tumor and surrounding anatomical structures in most cases without the application of a contrast agent, ensuring optimal planning of the applicator tract. MRI enables real-time, multiplanar imaging, thus simultaneous observation of the applicator and target tumor is possible during targeting with adaptable slice angulations in case of challenging tumor positions. Typical ablation zone appearance during therapy monitoring with MRI enables safe assessment of the therapy result, resulting in a high primary efficacy rate. Recent advancements in ablation probes have shortened treatment times, while technical strategies address applicator visibility issues. MR-imaging immediately after the procedure is used to rule out complications and to assess technical success. Especially in smaller neoplasms, MRI-guided liver ablation demonstrates positive outcomes in terms of technical success rates, as well as promising survival and recurrence rates. Additionally, percutaneous biopsy under MR guidance offers an alternative to classic guidance modalities, providing high soft tissue contrast and thereby increasing the reliability of lesion detection, particularly in cases involving smaller lesions. Despite these advantages, the use of MR guidance in clinical routine is still limited to few indications and centers, due to by high costs, extended duration, and the need for specialized expertise. In conclusion, MRI-guided interventions could benefit from ongoing advancements in hardware, software, and devices. Such progress has the potential to expand diagnostic and treatment options in the field of interventional radiology.

Prostate cancer risk stratification using magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion vs systematic prostate biopsy.

BACKGROUND: Image-guided approaches improve the diagnostic yield of prostate biopsy and frequently modify estimates of clinical risk. To better understand the impact of magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy (MRF-TB) on risk assessment, we compared the distribution of National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk groupings, as calculated from MRF-TB vs systematic biopsy alone. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 713 patients who underwent MRF-TB from January 2017 to July 2021. The primary study objective was to compare the distribution of National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk groupings obtained using MRF-TB (systematic + targeted) vs systematic biopsy. RESULTS: Systematic biopsy alone classified 10% of samples as very low risk and 18.7% of samples as low risk, while MRF-TB classified 10.5% of samples as very low risk and 16.1% of samples as low risk. Among patients with benign findings, low-risk disease, and favorable/intermediate-risk disease on systematic biopsy alone, 4.6% of biopsies were reclassified as high risk or very high risk on MRF-TB. Of 207 patients choosing active surveillance, 64 (31%), 91 (44%), 42 (20.2%), and 10 (4.8%) patients were classified as having very low-risk, low-risk, and favorable/intermediate-risk and unfavorable/intermediate-risk criteria, respectively. When using systematic biopsy alone, 204 patients (28.7%) were classified as having either very low-risk and low-risk disease per NCCN guidelines, while 190 men (26.6%) received this classification when using MRF-TB. CONCLUSION: The addition of MRF-TB to systematic biopsy may change eligibility for active surveillance in only a small proportion of patients with prostate cancer. Our findings support the need for routine use of quantitative risk assessment over risk groupings to promote more nuanced decision making for localized cancer.

Impact of operator expertise on transperineal free-hand mpMRI-fusion-targeted biopsies under local anaesthesia for prostate cancer diagnosis: a multicenter prospective learning curve.

PURPOSE: Transperineal mpMRI-targeted fusion prostate biopsies (TPFBx) are recommended for prostate cancer diagnosis, but little is known about their learning curve (LC), especially when performed under local anaesthesia (LA). We investigated how operators' and institutions' experience might affect biopsy results. METHODS: Baseline, procedure and pathology data of consecutive TPFBx under LA were prospectively collected at two academic Institutions, from Sep 2016 to May 2019. Main inclusion criterion was a positive MRI. Endpoints were biopsy duration, clinically significant prostate cancer detection rate on targeted cores (csCDR-T), complications, pain and urinary function. Data were analysed per-centre and per-operator (with ≥ 50 procedures), comparing groups of consecutive patient, and subsequently through regression and CUSUM analyses. Learning curves were plotted using an adjusted lowess smoothing function. RESULTS: We included 1014 patients, with 27.3% csCDR-T and a median duration was 15 min (IQR 12-18). A LC for biopsy duration was detected, with the steeper phase ending after around 50 procedures, in most operators. No reproducible evidence in favour of an impact of experience on csPCa detection was found at operator's level, whilst a possible gentle LC of limited clinical relevance emerged at Institutional level; complications, pain and IPSS variations were not related to operator experience. CONCLUSION: The implementation of TPFBx under LA was feasible, safe and efficient since early phases with a relatively short learning curve for procedure time.

Interventional cardiovascular magnetic resonance: state-of-the-art.

Transcatheter cardiovascular interventions increasingly rely on advanced imaging. X-ray fluoroscopy provides excellent visualization of catheters and devices, but poor visualization of anatomy. In contrast, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides excellent visualization of anatomy and can generate real-time imaging with frame rates similar to X-ray fluoroscopy. Realization of MRI as a primary imaging modality for cardiovascular interventions has been slow, largely because existing guidewires, catheters and other devices create imaging artifacts and can heat dangerously. Nonetheless, numerous clinical centers have started interventional cardiovascular magnetic resonance (iCMR) programs for invasive hemodynamic studies or electrophysiology procedures to leverage the clear advantages of MRI tissue characterization, to quantify cardiac chamber function and flow, and to avoid ionizing radiation exposure. Clinical implementation of more complex cardiovascular interventions has been challenging because catheters and other tools require re-engineering for safety and conspicuity in the iCMR environment. However, recent innovations in scanner and interventional device technology, in particular availability of high performance low-field MRI scanners could be the inflection point, enabling a new generation of iCMR procedures. In this review we review these technical considerations, summarize contemporary clinical iCMR experience, and consider potential future applications.

A Modified Technique for Interventional MRI-Guided Deep Brain Stimulation Using the ClearPoint System.

BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is increasingly performed using imaging-based techniques, which are rapidly evolving to minimize invasiveness and use limited resources efficiently. OBJECTIVE: To describe a modified surgical technique for interventional MRI-guided stereotactic procedures using ClearPoint. METHODS: A total of 160 consecutive DBS cases for Parkinson disease (48%), essential tremor (44%), dual essential tremor/Parkinson disease (3%), and dystonia (5%) were studied. Technique modifications included (1) preplanning the target/trajectory, (2) adoption of a smaller incision and new stereotactic frame, (3) changing the sequence of surgical steps, aiming to final target PRIOR to drilling, (4) reducing burr hole size, (5) minimizing dural opening, and (6) anchoring leads with a bio cement/plate combination in lieu of commercial devices. Demographic data, radial error, number of passes, and case time were prospectively collected while complications and clinical outcomes were retrospectively assessed. RESULTS: One hundred and forty seven DBS patients had 262 total leads placed. Average radial error was 0.41 mm bilaterally. Seventy nine leads had error <0.2 mm; 6 leads had error >1 mm. Pin-to-stylet insertion time, pin-to-frame removal time, and pin-to-room departure time were 2 hours 1 minute, 2 hours 48 minutes, and 3 hours 16 minutes, respectively, and were significantly shorter than those obtained with the original ClearPoint technique for our first 150 DBS cases ( P < .0001). Complications included infection with hardware removal (2.5%) and superficial hemorrhage without permanent neurological sequelae (1.9%). CONCLUSION: The modified ClearPoint technique maintains accuracy while reducing invasiveness and MRI time. This workflow can be expanded to other applications, including laser interstitial thermal therapy and gene delivery.

Intra-practice Urologist-level Variation in Targeted Fusion Biopsy Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the extent to which the urologist performing biopsy contributes to variation in prostate cancer detection during fusion-guided prostate biopsy. METHODS: All men in the Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative (MUSIC) clinical registry who underwent fusion biopsy at Michigan Medicine from August 2017 to March 2019 were included. The primary outcomes were clinically significant cancer detection rate (defined as Gleason Grade ≥2) in targeted cores and clinically significant cancer detection on targeted cores stratified by PI-RADS score. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 1133 fusion biopsies performed by 5 providers were included. When adjusting for patient age, PSA, race, family history, prostate volume, clinical stage, and PI-RADS score, there was no significant difference in targeted clinically significant cancer detection rates across providers (range = 38.5%-46.9%, adjusted P-value = .575). Clinically significant cancer detection rates ranged from 11.1% to 16.7% in PI-RADS 3 (unadjusted P = .838), from 24.6% to 43.4% in PI-RADS 4 (adjusted P = .003), and from 69.4% to 78.8% in PI-RADS 5 (adjusted P = .766) lesions. CONCLUSION: There was a statistically significant difference in clinically significant prostate cancer detection in PI-RADS 4 lesions across providers. These findings suggest that even among experienced providers, variation at the urologist level may contribute to differences in clinically significant cancer detection rates within PI-RADS 4 lesions. However, the relative impact of biopsy technique, radiologist interpretation, and MR acquisition protocol requires further study.

Novel sampling scheme with reduced cores in men with multiparametric MRI-visible lesions undergoing prostate biopsy.

PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of various prostate biopsy protocols with reduced cores on the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in individuals with MRI-visible lesions (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System ≥ 3). METHODS: A total of 464 patients with MRI-visible lesions were recruited. All patients underwent two or more targeted biopsies (TB) and systematic biopsies (SB). Several hypothetical biopsy schemes were set-up: TB alone, TB+ipsilateral SB, TB+contralateral SB, TB+SB of the targeted sector (TB+t-SB), and TB+SB of the non-targeted sector (TB+n-SB). A subgroup analysis of patients with multiple MRI-visible lesions was performed. The standard of reference was defined as TB+SB. McNemar test was used to compare csPCa detection rates between various sampling schemes. RESULTS: The detection rates for prostate cancer and csPCa were 72.8% (338 of 464) and 62.1% (288 of 464), respectively. There were 8.0%, 0.3%, 6.3%, 1.0%, and 4.5% cases in which TB alone, TB+ipsilateral SB, TB+contralateral SB, TB+t-SB, and TB+n-SB would have missed csPCa, respectively. All hypothetical schemes, with the exception of TB+contralateral SB (p = 0.063), significantly outperformed TB alone in terms of csPCa detection (p < 0.05). As for the multi-focus cohort, which included 48 cases, none of the non-index lesions had a higher Gleason grade than the index lesions within the same patients. CONCLUSION: TB+ipsilateral SB might be the optimal biopsy scheme for detecting csPCa. As for the multi-focus cohort, the biopsy of the non-index lesions provided limited pathological information.

Prostate Cancer Detection and Complications of Transperineal Versus Transrectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging-fusion Guided Prostate Biopsies.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the rates of detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) and complications associated with transperineal (TP) and transrectal (TR) biopsy approaches to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-fusion targeted biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified men who underwent TP or TR MRI-targeted biopsy with concurrent systematic random biopsy from August 2020 to August 2021. Primary outcomes were detection rates of csPCa and 30-day complication rates between the 2 MRI-biopsy groups. Data were additionally stratified by prior biopsy status. RESULTS: A total of 361 patients were included in the analysis. No demographic differences were observed. No significant differences were observed between TP and TR approaches on any of the outcomes of interest. TR MRI-targeted biopsies identified csPCa in 47.2% of patients, and TP MRI-targeted biopsies identified csPCa in 48.6% of patients (P = .78). No significant differences were observed in csPCa detection between the 2 approaches for patients on active surveillance (P = .59), patients with prior negative biopsy (P = .34), and patients who were biopsy naïve (P = .19). Complication rates did not vary by approach (P = .45). CONCLUSION: Neither the identification of csPCa by MRI-targeted biopsy nor rates of complications differed significantly based on a TR or TP approach. No differences were seen between MRI-targeted approaches based on prior biopsy or active surveillance status.

Adverse events and complications after magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) therapy in uterine fibroids - a systematic review and future perspectives.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this review was to analyze and summarize the most common adverse events (AEs) and complications after magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) therapy in uterine fibroids (UFs) and to establish the risk factors of their occurrence. METHODS: We searched for original research studies evaluating MRgFUS therapy in UFs with outcomes containing AEs and/or complications in different databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, SCOPUS, COCHRANE) until March 2022. Reviews, editorials, opinions or letters, case studies, conference papers and abstracts were excluded from the analysis. The systematic literature search identified 446 articles, 43 of which were analyzed. RESULTS: According to available evidence, the overall incidence of serious complications in MRgFUS therapy is relatively low. No AEs/complications were reported in 11 out of 43 analyzed studies. The mean occurrence of all AEs in the analyzed material was 24.67%. The most commonly described AEs included pain, skin burns, urinary tract infections and sciatic neuropraxia. Major AEs, such as skin ulcerations or deep vein thrombosis, occurred in 0.41% of cases in the analyzed material. CONCLUSION: MRgFUS seems to be safe in UF therapy. The occurrence of AEs, especially major ones, is relatively low in comparison with other methods. The new devices and more experience of their users seem to reduce AE rate. The lack of unification in AE reporting and missing data are the main issues in this area. More prospective, randomized studies with unified reporting and long follow-up are needed to determine the safety in a long-term perspective.

Comparative Effectiveness of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Versus In-bore Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsy.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the comparative effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound (MRI-U/S) fusion biopsy and in-bore MRI-targeted biopsy. METHODS: We identified men aged 18-89 with a diagnosis of elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA) or Gleason 6 prostate cancer on active surveillance who underwent MRI-U/S fusion prostate biopsy (12-core + targeted) in the office or in-bore MRI-targeted biopsy (MRI-IB; targeted only). The cancer detection rate (CDR; Gleason 6-10) and clinically significant CDR (csCDR; Gleason 7-10) were compared across biopsy techniques, adjusted for patient and radiographic features. RESULTS: A total of 280 patients (346 lesions) were included, of whom 23.9% were on active surveillance for Gleason 6 prostate cancer. In the per-patient analyses, there was no statistically significant difference in adjusted overall CDR (64.1% vs 54.2%; P = .24) or csCDR (36.5% vs 37.9%; P = .85) between MRI-U/S and MRI-IB biopsy. In the per-lesion analyses, there was no statistically significant difference in adjusted overall CDR (45.7% vs 50.1%; P = .49) between MRI-U/S and MRI-IB biopsy, but MRI-IB biopsy was associated with a higher csCDR than MRI-U/S biopsy (32.8% vs 21.4%; P = .02). CONCLUSION: We observed no statistically significant differences in cancer detection rates between MRI-U/S fusion biopsy and MRI-IB biopsy in per-patient analyses. However, MRI-IB biopsy was associated with higher csCDR when considering targeted biopsy cores only. These results suggest that systematic cores should be obtained when performing MRI-U/S fusion biopsy.

An interventional MRI guidewire combining profile and tip conspicuity for catheterization at 0.55T.

PURPOSE: We describe a clinical grade, "active", monopole antenna-based metallic guidewire that has a continuous shaft-to-tip image profile, a pre-shaped tip-curve, standard 0.89 mm (0.035″) outer diameter, and a detachable connector for catheter exchange during cardiovascular catheterization at 0.55T. METHODS: Electromagnetic simulations were performed to characterize the magnetic field around the antenna whip for continuous tip visibility. The active guidewire was manufactured using medical grade materials in an ISO Class 7 cleanroom. RF-induced heating of the active guidewire prototype was tested in one gel phantom per ASTM 2182-19a, alone and in tandem with clinical metal-braided catheters. Real-time MRI visibility was tested in one gel phantom and in-vivo in two swine. Mechanical performance was compared with commercial equivalents. RESULTS: The active guidewire provided continuous "profile" shaft and tip visibility in-vitro and in-vivo, analogous to guidewire shaft-and-tip profiles under X-ray. The MRI signal signature matched simulation results. Maximum unscaled RF-induced temperature rise was 5.2°C and 6.5°C (3.47 W/kg local background specific absorption rate), alone and in tandem with a steel-braided catheter, respectively. Mechanical characteristics matched commercial comparator guidewires. CONCLUSION: The active guidewire was clearly visible via real-time MRI at 0.55T and exhibits a favorable geometric sensitivity profile depicting the guidewire continuously from shaft-to-tip including a unique curved-tip signature. RF-induced heating is clinically acceptable. This design allows safe device navigation through luminal structures and heart chambers. The detachable connector allows delivery and exchange of cardiovascular catheters while maintaining guidewire position. This enhanced guidewire design affords the expected performance of X-ray guidewires during human MRI catheterization.

Silent active device tracking for MR-guided interventional procedures.

PURPOSE: To evaluate a silent MR active catheter tracking sequence that allows conducting catheter interventions with low acoustic noise levels. METHODS: To reduce the acoustic noise associated with MR catheter tracking, we implemented a technique previously used in conventional MRI. The gradient waveforms are modified to reduce the sound pressure level (SPL) and avoid acoustic resonances of the MRI system. The efficacy of the noise reduction was assessed by software-predicted SPL and verified by measurements. Furthermore, the quality of the catheter tracking signal was assessed in a phantom experiment and during interventional cardiovascular MRI sessions targeted at isthmus-related flutter ablation. RESULTS: The maximum measured SPL in the scanner room was 104 dB(A) for real-time imaging, and 88 dB(A) and 69 dB(A) for conventional and silent tracking, respectively. The SPL measured at different positions in the MR suite using silent tracking were 65-69 dB(A), and thus within the range of a normal conversation. Equivalent signal quality and tracking accuracy were obtained using the silent variant of the catheter tracking sequence. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that silent MR catheter tracking capabilities are identical to conventional catheter tracking. The achieved acoustic noise reduction comes at no penalty in terms of tracking quality or temporal resolution, improves comfort and safety, and can overcome the need for MR-compatible communication equipment and background noise suppression during the actual interventional procedure.

Significance of non-standardized magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities and subsequent targeted prostate cancer biopsy for pathologists: A retrospective observational study.

Prostate biopsy is essential in diagnosing prostate cancer. The Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-transrectal ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy are also useful for diagnosis. However, the burden of implementing and maintaining these techniques should be considered. Therefore, we investigated the significance of non-standardized pre-biopsy MRI abnormalities (conditions not in accordance with PI-RADS) and subsequent targeted biopsy. We collected clinicopathological data, including the presence or absence of MRI abnormalities, through biopsies from January 2017 to February 2022 at the Kanagawa Cancer Center and performed statistical analyses. We enrolled in 1086 cases: MRI abnormalities were observed in 861 cases (79.3%). In these 861 cases, the adenocarcinoma detection rate, number of positive cores, and length of the highest Grade Group (GG) lesions were significantly higher. In the multivariate analysis, MRI abnormalities were the most significant factor for detecting adenocarcinoma of ≥GG 2 (odds ratio: 4.52, 95% confidence interval: 3.08-6.63). Targeted biopsy showed a higher percentage of positive cores with ≥GG2 and longer highest GG lesion lengths than systematic biopsy. Furthermore, the highest GG was upgraded in 109 of 788 cases by targeted biopsy. However, several adenocarcinomas (125/788; 15.9%) could not be detected using only targeted biopsy. Non-standardized MRI abnormalities are powerful predictors of cancer and grading. Targeted biopsies based on MRI abnormalities provide several benefits. Owing to the relatively low implementation hurdle, these biopsies may serve as a bridge until the ideal approaches are popularized if the limitations are well understood.